|
The main reason it's a crime to marry multiple people is because of fraud and the lies involved. Some people, usually men, can sometimes run completely separate lives without either of their spouses being aware of it. Those laws were put in place to protect people from this kind of deception, and their existence in countries where women have more civil rights is no coincidence.
Marriage, as an institution, might be on the way out, and I don't have a problem with open marriages, free love, or whatever. Heff can do whatever he wants behind closed doors, but women should still be able to get back at men who lead double lives. For that reason alone, I think that Polygamy should remain as it is today. Honestly, I think it's a state law issue, so there's probably somewhere in America where it is legal, or at least not specifically illegal. Maybe you should take your harem there and everybody can live happily everafter! |
« previous1 next »
quoting http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/2004-10-03-turley_x.htm :
-----
Individuals have a recognized constitutional right to engage in any form of consensual sexual relationship with any number of partners. Thus, a person can live with multiple partners and even sire children from different partners so long as they do not marry. However, when that same person accepts a legal commitment for those partners "as a spouse," we jail them.
Likewise, someone such as singer Britney Spears can have multiple husbands so long as they are consecutive, not concurrent. Thus, Spears can marry and divorce men in quick succession and become the maven of tabloid covers. Yet if she marries two of the men for life, she will become the matron of a state prison.
-------
Laws need to be revisited. I understand in some societies, men are the all powerful gender... and these kind of laws protect women ... but every society should give it a thought. Actually polygamy is legal in lot of countries and ironically its those countries where women anyway do not have much rights.
So agree ? or disagree ?
Reference: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/2004-10-03-turley_x.htm