|
Ever heard of something called conservation of energy? If you knew anything about physics, you'd realize that there is no way that this idea can work. We should be putting our money into nuclear technology. We have plenty of fuel and well established science to guide us, and the impact on the environment is minimal. All this alternative energy science is a red herring, Einstein made the discovery that will solve the energy crises almost a century ago. Stop fooling around with bunk science and get behind nuclear power if you want to save the environment.
|
|
There's plenty we can learn about energy production from nature. Plants have about a four-billion-year head start on us for figuring out the best way to do it. The more we research and learn, the more options we'll have available to us.
At the same time, we cannot disregard what we already have. Nuclear power is eco-friendly, well-understood, well-regulated, and when operated within those regulations, completely safe. We have to find a good place to put the waste, but think of this-- if nuclear power plants had been built through the 1990s and today at the same rate as they were in the 1960s and 1970s, our greenhouse gas emissions would already be considerably lower than they are today. |
« previous1 next »
| We display only user ads. If its your opinion, your ad will be displayed in this box. Update your profile with your adsense code. |
A recent article in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society an enzyme has been found that increases the efficiency of a plants separation of H20 molecules during photosynthesis. Scientists are looking for a way to synthesize this enzyme in order to more efficiently turn water into oxygen and hydrogen fuel. Although current research into biodiesel and ethanol fuel is promising, in the long run it just doesn't make sense to make fuel out of food.
The real progress will come when science can catch up with nature, which can obviously teach us everything we could ever want to know. I'm not saying that we should scrap our current alternative energy strategies, just that we need to expand our efforts into pure science, and not compromise our strategies to fit existing knowledge.