Tags
Add this link to...
Tell a friend
 |
Maybe I just don't want to believe it. You raise some good points, but in my opinion, most of the 9/11 truth movement is a symptom of terrorism, and has nothing to do with the government. Let's say there was some government involvement. How many was it? The guy who changes light bulbs in the street lamps, the firemen, the cops, the garbage men? Just how deep do you think this conspiracy goes? I think most government employees had nothing to do with it.
If anyone in the government was involved, or was aware and restricted from talking about it, we need to know. The problem is all of the secrecy. We need to press our government to be more open about the shady dealings of the NSA, CIA and whatever other secret organization have been created since Bushco and his cronies took over. Ultimately, however, I think that the trend which has begun to popularize is dangerous. People have begun to have a basic distrust for the government, and this represents a tragic turn for America. Our democracy is unique in that it can heal itself like no government ever before it. The problem is that the fear we have been subject too has allowed the current ruling party to damage the government's ability to weed out the bad apples. My point is this: we don't have to throw out the whole government even if there were some connections, some omissions, etc. That's exactly the kind of destabilization that the terrorists, foreign or domestic, were going for. The 9/11 truth movement is just more and more terror, fear and paranoia, when what this country really needs is logic, reason, and a commitment to justice. When you have the proof, and some names, that's when I want to hear about it. If all you have is speculation, which most of that evidence is, stop doing the neocons a favor by scaring the crap out of everyone. |
« previous1 next »
button
| We display only user ads. If its your opinion, your ad will be displayed in this box. Update your profile with your adsense code. |
The two world trade center towers were the 1st steel framed buildings in the history of the United states to collapse due to "fire", but they were hit by planes, bla bla bla whatever.
Building 7 of the world trade center was the 3rd ever steel framed building to collapse due to fire. It wasn't hit by a plane, and the video of it falling looks exactly like a demolition.
Remember the 1st world trade center bombing in 1993. Check out Emad Salem. This guy was an FBI informant who's testimony was used in a criminal court to convict the perpetrators, and sentence them to death. He says that the FBI had prior knowledge of the 1993 attacks, and has released tape recordings of his conversations with the FBI.
Then there's bush's town hall meeting flub. on Jan 14th 2002 in Florida. After being asked how 9-11 made him feel he said: ------"Thank you, Jordan.
Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident."---------
So he saw the 1st plane hit the towers on TV huh?... No video of the first plane hit was on TV till the next day. How did he the CIA know to be filming the towers On 9-11?
Then there's the MANY connections between the Bush Administration, the BinLadin Family, and the Saudi Royal Family. For instance, Bush started Arbusto energy... His failed energy company. The Suadi BinLadin Group was his primary backer. The head of that group at the time was Osama's older brother. There is only ONY degree of separation between Bush and Osama Bin Ladin.... Strange how we haven't caught Osama either.
There's John O'neil. He resigned the FBI because of government sand-bagging on terrorist related issues in Summer 2001. He died on the 1st day of his new job..... Head of security of the World Trade Center Towers.
Marvin Bush was a chairman of the board for Securicon, the company in charge of security for the WTC.
Ummm. There's just so much.
The Project for a new american century. You can look it up online. It's a document on how they'll take over the world signed by Bush Sr. calling for a "peral harbor like attack" as being necessary in order for get the American people behind their plan.
Then there's all of the secrecy. They didn't have an official investigation for 6 months later, after all of the evidence had been destroyed, and then they proceeded to spend less on it them on Clinton's scandal. They had the inquiry behind closed doors, and the panal was "independant" in name only. They've been so secret, and there are enough FACTS to imply their guilt... They've done nothing to convise me otherwise.
Perhaps the main question... Who had something to gain from this...? As far as I can see, only they did. Their companies are making BILLIONS from this, while they've given themselves HUGE TAX CUTS, and wrung up an additional 3 trillion dollars in Debt for the American People to pay off.
There's so much of this stuff. Really, it couldn't be more clear that they were behind it. more than a third of Americans think the governmant had involvement in 9-11, and that's with a full fledged media monopoly. It's enough I think to put the burden of truth on them to prove they weren't involved. And as I post this I feel like they're putting my on some list....